United States v. Aldrick Pat Bailey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the argument that “the judge erred by referring the jury back to the earlier jury instructions rather than directly responding to the jury's questions”
• rejecting the argument that “the judge erred by referring the jury back to the earlier jury instructions rather than directly responding to the jury’s questions”
• the plaintiff’s argument that a trial court erred by referring the jury to earlier jury instructions rather than directly responding to a list of questions was contrary to Eleventh Circuit precedent (citing United States v. Parr, 716 F.2d 796, 808–09 (11th Cir. 1983)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).