United States v. Alcario Estrada Rosales

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that convictions for violations of narcotics laws do “not normally suggest the special probative value on the issue of credibility contemplated by Fed. R. Evid. 609(a)(1)”
• excluding convictions for forgery, burglary, conspiracy, illegal possession of a firearm, and violation of narcotics laws as “not normally suggest[ive of] the special probative value on the issue of credibility contemplated by Fed. R. Evid. 609(a)(1)”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).