Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that PRPs that settle with the United States accept a specific liability
• “Some courts have stated a purely economic interest is insufficient to support a motion to intervene.”
• \Some courts have stated that a purely economic interest is insufficient to support a motion to intervene.\
• “a party has more than an economic interest where it is the real party in interest and where the applicant would have standing to raise the claim.”
• in light of the goal of promoting early large settlements, the assertion of a contribution defense by a second-round settlor against a first-round settlor is far more problematic than its assertion against a non-settlor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).