United States v. Albert Woods

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that because BOP is responsible for computing sentencing credit, § 5G1.3(b
• stating the mandatory-minimum sentence was the shortest sentence possible absent a government motion and concluding it was not substantively unreasonable
• standard of review; statutory mandatory-minimum sentence was shortest sentence possible absent government motion and was not substantively unreasonable
• ineffective-assistance claims are usually best litigated in collateral proceedings; this court considers such claims on direct appeal only if record has been fully developed, counsel’s error is readily apparent, or not acting would amount to plain miscarriage of justice
• noting statutory minimum sentence was not substantively unreasonable
• statutory minimum sentence was not substantively unreasonable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).