United States v. Albert Thomas Clark

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant's stipulation that the predicate offense element under 18 U.S.C. 922(g
• holding that defendant’s stipulation that he had been previously convicted of a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year was sufficient to relieve the government of any obligation of proving any aspect of that element
• rejecting defendant's claim that once five-year period expires, civil rights are restored regardless of whether the five-year period has overlapped with successive convictions
• “We hold . . . as a matter of federal law that a state conviction for a violent felony is not excluded from consideration under § 924(e) by the provisions of § 921(a)(20
• “[T]o bring a 16 defendant under the provisions of § 924(e) the government must ‐13‐ UNITED STATES V. SELLERS 1 show . . . the convictions are of the type referred to in 2 § 922(g)(1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).