United States v. Albert N. Dukow, Appeal of Thomas S. Crow. Appeal of Saul Brourman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that defendants failed to demonstrate prejudice because they had neither made an offer of testimony nor given nor any indication that lost witnesses possessed unique knowledge
• deaths of two potential witnesses did not show prejudice where “no offer was made concerning the substance of the testimony that the two deceased persons would have proffered”
• deceased witnesses possessed no \special knowledge\ of the transaction in question
• deceased witnesses possessed no “special knowledge” of the transaction in question

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).