Skip to main content
· 7/13/1994

United States v. Albert Lee

Citations

  • 25 F.3d 997
  • 39 Fed. R. Serv. 1004
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 17144
  • 1994 WL 282326

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “We encourage [trial] courts to make specific fact findings concerning their application of . . . Daubert in each case where the question arises, because such findings will facilitate this Court’s appellate review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cox, Carnes, Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.