United States v. Albert L. Christner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• asking whether each provision requires proof of a fact that the other does not
• considering whether each offense requires proof of elements that the other does not
• no double jeopardy violation when defendant committed separate acts in violating two statutory provisions
• no double jeopardy violation when defendant committed separate acts in violating two statutory provisions
• “An indictment which charges a single offense in multiple counts is multiplicitous”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).