United States v. Albert J. Muick

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the [suspect’s] attorney’s letter and phone call [to police stating that his client would not talk without a lawyer] were insufficient to invoke -4- the Miranda right to counsel. Only [the suspect] could invoke his Miranda right to counsel.” (citations omitted)
• recounting evidence deemed sufficient to uphold convictions on child pornography charges
• defendant lacked standing to challenge the constitutionality of a statute under which he was not prosecuted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).