United States v. Albert Inv. Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding proposed intervenor’s statutory right to pursue defendants for contribution was a sufficient interest for intervention as a matter of right
• “[T]he threat of economic injury from the outcome of litigation undoubtedly gives a petitioner the requisite interest.” (cleaned up)
• “The threat of economic injury from the outcome of litigation undoubtedly gives a [movant] the requisite interest.” (quoting WildEarth Guardians, 573 F.3d at 996)
• “[I]intervention as of right ‘may be subject to appropriate conditions or restrictions responsive among other things to the requirements of efficient conduct of the proceedings.’ ”
• “We review the denial of a motion to intervene as a right de novo and denial of a motion for permissive intervention for an abuse of discretion.”
• “We review the denial of a motion to intervene as of right de novo and denial of a motion for permissive intervention for an abuse of discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).