Skip to main content
· 7/10/2018

United States v. Albert Hernandez, Jr.

Citations

  • 894 F.3d 1104

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that we will reverse an evidentiary ruling “only if [it] is ‘erroneous and prejudicial’” (quoting Wagner v. Cnty. of Maricopa, 747 F.3d 1048, 1052 (9th Cir. 2013))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.