Skip to main content
· 10/30/2015

United States v. Albert Andrews, III

Citations

  • 808 F.3d 964
  • 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 18924
  • 2015 WL 6575671

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying 9 clear error standard in reviewing district court’s imposition of obstruction of justice enhancement
  • applying clear error standard in reviewing district court’s imposition of obstruction of justice enhancement
  • “The government bears the burden of proving the facts supporting [a Guidelines sentencing] enhancement by a preponderance of the evidence.”
  • reviewing application of obstruction of justice enhancement
  • discussing burden of proof for sentencing enhancement
  • reviewing application of obstruction of justice enhancement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilkinson, Motz, Keenan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.