· 10/30/2015
United States v. Albert Andrews, III
Citations
- 808 F.3d 964
- 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 18924
- 2015 WL 6575671
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying 9 clear error standard in reviewing district court’s imposition of obstruction of justice enhancement
- applying clear error standard in reviewing district court’s imposition of obstruction of justice enhancement
- “The government bears the burden of proving the facts supporting [a Guidelines sentencing] enhancement by a preponderance of the evidence.”
- reviewing application of obstruction of justice enhancement
- discussing burden of proof for sentencing enhancement
- reviewing application of obstruction of justice enhancement
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wilkinson, Motz, Keenan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.