United States v. Alan Louis Hunyady

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting defendant’s argument that he had a legitimate expectation of privacy because he was “a trespasser under Michigan law at the time of the search in question.”
• trespasser who had tenuous connection with otherwise empty house had no legitimate expectation of privacy to contest its search
• trespasser who had tenuous connection with otherwise empty house had no legitimate expectation of privacy to contest its search
• trespasser who had tenuous connection with otherwise empty house had no legitimate expectation of privacy to contest its search
• trespasser who had tenuous connection with otherwise empty house had no legitimate expectation of privacy to contest its search

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).