United States v. Alan Kanovsky

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• examining whether the evidence was 24 relevant, whether the defendant was surprised or prejudiced by the evidence, and whether the 25 defendant had the opportunity to meet the proof as presented
• unfair surprise a relevant factor in determining the propriety of 3 admitting evidence after a party has rested

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).