United States v. Alan E. Kaniss

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding restitution order where sentencing court failed to establish schedule of restitution payments
• affirming revocation because the district court “was aware” of the exception
• district court’s sentence above recommended range was not abuse of discretion where district court considered statutory factors
• district court's sentence above recommended range was not abuse of discretion where district court considered statutory factors
• standard of review; Chapter 7 Guidelines are advisory and nonbinding; district court may depart from suggested revocation imprisonment range when, in its considered discretion, the departure is warranted
• no abuse of discretion for district court to exceed revocation table's recommendation based in part on defendant's failure to take advantage of substance abuse programs outside of prison

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).