United States v. Alaboud

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the government must prove that a reasonable person would “construe [the communication] as a serious expression of an intention to inflict bodily harm”
• holding that the government must prove that a reasonable person would “construe [the communication] as a serious expression of an intention to inflict bodily harm”
• indicating that these formulations, in operation, are the same as they ultimately depend on how a reasonable listener would understand the communication
• indicating that these formulations, in operation, are the same as they ultimately depend on how a reasonable listener would understand the communication
• \serious expression of an intention to inflict bodily harm\ (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).