United States v. Akeem Joseph

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a suppression argument in the district court must match the argument in the court of appeals to be preserved
• holding that while parties may not raise new arguments, they may place “greater emphasis and more fully explain an argument on appeal”
• holding that “arguments rather than issues are what parties preserve or waive”
• holding “that for parties to preserve an argument for appeal, they must have raised the same argument in the District Court—merely raising an issue that encompasses the appellate argument” results in waiver of the argument (emphases omitted)
• “[R]aising an issue in the District Court is insufficient to preserve for appeal all arguments bearing on that issue” (emphasis added).
• “[R]aising an issue in the District Court is insufficient to preserve for appeal all arguments bearing on that issue” (emphasis added).

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).