· 9/16/2010
United States v. Ahders
Citations
- 622 F.3d 115
- 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 19818
- 2010 WL 3632812
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- remanding for “further consideration and explanation of the sentence,” including a four-level enhancement
- remanding for “further consideration and explanation of the sentence,” including a four‐level enhancement
- “The district court is required to rule on controverted matters that will affect sentencing, but it may do so by adopting the recommendations of the [PSR].”
- “A district court need not specifically recite all the facts relevant to its Guidelines calculation; rather, it is sufficient for the district court to adopt the findings in the presentence report^/ those findings are adequate to support the sentence imposed.”
- listing relevant factors for the district court to consider
- listing relevant factors for the district court to consider
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Katzmann, Hall, Chin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.