Skip to main content
· 5/2/1904

United States v. Ah Chung

Citations

  • 130 F. 885
  • 65 C.C.A. 562
  • 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4245

Syllabus

<p>1. Aliens — Chinese—Exclusion—Residence—Presumptions.</p> <p>In proceedings for the deportation of a Chinaman, the fact that he was permitted to live in the United States for 19 years without molestation was insufficient to raise a presumption that his arrival antedated the date on which the exclusion act (Act May 6, 1882, c. 126, 22 Stat. 58, as amended by Act July 5, 1884, c. 220, 23 Stat. 115 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1305]), went into effect, he never having registered as a laborer or merchant as required by law.</p> <p>y 1. Citizenship of the Chinese, see notes to Gee Foot Sing v. U. S., 1 C.. C. A. 212, and Lee Sing Far v. Same, 35 C. C. A. 332.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • foreign sale was not authorized by U.S. patent holder

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ross

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.