United States v. Adrian Wilson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it would be improper to construe inconclusive legislative history so as to apply a statute in a manner inconsistent with its clear and unambiguous meaning
• “any official” could not be restricted to “any federal official” where Congress left the statutory language unqualified

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).