United States v. Adil Shahryar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Common sense, as well as deeply rooted concepts of federalism, dictate that the Speedy Act rules relate only to federal and not to state custody. To hold otherwise would require our rejection of the doctrine of dual sovereignty....”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).