United States v. Adalberto Rubio-Topete

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding for further findings when district court found that behavior and testimony of defendant warranted enhancement because the court faded to address specifically each of the elements of perjury
• defendant not deprived 20 of due process right to present a defense when excluded evidence “was marginally relevant, at 21 best,” and would have added little, if anything, to defendant’s defense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).