Skip to main content
· 4/8/1987

United States v. Adalberto Gallo-Roman

Citations

  • 816 F.2d 76
  • 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 4916

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that DEA agents’ belief that evidence might be destroyed was not mere speculation because it was reasonable for DEA agents to conclude that once suspects had been alerted that their scheme had been uncovered that they would attempt to destroy evidence.
  • exigent circumstances exception applied, in part, because “a mere twenty minutes” was an “unrealistic” amount of time to secure a warrant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Feinberg, Timbers, Pierce

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.