United States v. Acrey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “courts in this Circuit regularly conclude that [the defendant’s competing] declarations do not undermine the plaintiff's showing in the first stage of the conditional certification process.”
• noting that courts in this Circuit regularly consider hearsay on a motion for conditional certification, “which is only a preliminary determination,” and emphasizing that defendants “will have another opportunity to object to [ ] certification after discovery”
• declining to consider competing declarations from defendants as “courts in this Circuit regularly conclude that such declarations do not undermine the plaintiffs’ showing in the first stage of the conditional certification process”
• describing notice attached to conditional certification 2 motion as a consent to joinder
• “[C]ourts in this Circuit regularly conclude that [competing] declarations do not undermine the plaintiffs’ showing in the first stage of the conditional certification process.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).