Skip to main content
· 11/24/2008

United States v. Acosta-Roman

Citations

  • 549 F.3d 1
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 24042
  • 2008 WL 4966725

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing whether \the waiver of appeal provision is enforceable under the circumstances of this case\
  • “The waiver provision in Acosta’s plea agreement states that he waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence ....”
  • district court exercising discretion that was contemplated by the plea agreement did not exceed the \terms and conditions\ of that agreement
  • district court exercising discretion that was contemplated by the plea agreement did not exceed the “terms and conditions” of that agreement
  • applying Mathews framework to fireman suspended without pre- deprivation hearing
  • discussing the terms of a similar waiver

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Torruella, Lipez, Diclerico

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.