United States v. Acevedo-Landin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• under Connecticut law, ‘‘[t]here can be no intentional interference with contractual relations by someone who is directly or indirectly a party to the contract’’ (emphasis added; internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).