Skip to main content
· 4/16/1999

United States v. Accra Pac, Inc.

Citations

  • 173 F.3d 630
  • 29 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 21129
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 7421
  • 1999 WL 222944

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a report of current pollutants on land did not constitute concrete injury
  • holding that “being put on a blacklist... is treated as immediately redressible harm because it diminishes (or eliminates) the opportunity to practice one’s profession even if the list. . . does not impose legal obligations”
  • “One of many orders interpreting or implementing a consent decree cannot readily be called ‘final’, and we have held accordingly that housekeeping orders in long-running cases are not appealable.”
  • “[A] litigant may not appeal from unfavorable statements in a judicial opinion, if the judgment was fa- vorable.”
  • “[A] litigant may not appeal from unfavorable statements in a judicial opinion, if the judgment was fa- vorable.”
  • “[A] litigant may not appeal from unfavorable statements in a judicial opinion, if the judgment was fa- vorable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Posner, Flaum, Easterbrook

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.