United States v. Abraham Cruz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “there could be no plain error” where “we have yet to decide” the issue and “[o]ther circuit courts are split” (citation omitted)
• applying plain error review where the defendant “failed to avail himself of several opportunities to oppose the Government’s motion”
• deeming waived “arguments that were raised for the first time in the Reply Brief”
• deeming waived “arguments that were raised for the first time in the Reply Brief”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).