United States v. Abelardo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that individual defendants were entitled to qualified immunity given “the current state of the developing law in this context, particularly involving student speech originating off-campus and by use of the internet.”
• finding insufficient disruption when a group of girls posted “raunchy photographs” of themselves, resulting in “‘divisiveness’ with the girls on the volleyball teams” because one group of girls approved and one group of girls “wanted to have no part of it”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).