United States v. Abel Casarez-Bravo, D.C. No

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because conviction under Section 11360(a) can be for transportation of marijuana for personal use, the mere fact of conviction under that statute would not necessarily qualify as conviction of a controlled substance offense under the Guidelines
• allowing a court to look past the statutory definition of a crime and to examine judicially noticeable facts or documents that clearly establish the conviction to be a predicate conviction for enhancement purposes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).