Skip to main content
· 9/17/1981

United States v. Abdullah Shabazz A/K/A Daniel Clincy

Citations

  • 657 F.2d 189

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • precluding § 2255 review even though petitioner filed a pro se brief on direct appeal
  • “Claims which were raised and decided on direct appeal cannot be relitigated on a motion to vacate pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Heaney, Bright, Ross

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.