Skip to main content
· 10/5/2012

United States v. Abdul Kanu

Citations

  • 402 U.S. App. D.C. 368
  • 695 F.3d 74
  • 2012 WL 4820813
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 20789

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “District courts . . . are vested with broad discretion in determining whether to hold a party to a stipulation. . . .”
  • “[U]nder the invited error doctrine [] a party may not complain on appeal of errors that he himself invited or provoked the district court to commit.” (quoting United States v. Wells, 519 U.S. 482, 488 (1997))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Henderson, Rogers, Tatel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.