· 8/16/2013
United States v. Abdirahman Mohamed
Citations
- 727 F.3d 832
- 92 Fed. R. Serv. 225
- 2013 WL 4259495
- 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 17005
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Smith does not per se require a new trial merely because the district court sustained an objection to a question seeking to elicit [the witness’s] address.” (quotations omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Riley, Melloy, Shepherd
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.