Skip to main content
· 8/16/2013

United States v. Abdirahman Mohamed

Citations

  • 727 F.3d 832
  • 92 Fed. R. Serv. 225
  • 2013 WL 4259495
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 17005

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Smith does not per se require a new trial merely because the district court sustained an objection to a question seeking to elicit [the witness’s] address.” (quotations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Riley, Melloy, Shepherd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.