Skip to main content
· 1/21/1992

United States v. Abdelkader Helmy, United States of America v. James E. Huffman

Citations

  • 951 F.2d 988
  • 92 Daily Journal DAR 900
  • 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1192
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 565

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • assuming that the mandatory Guidelines were subject to the prohibition against vagueness and addressing a vagueness challenge to a Guidelines provision on the merits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goodwin, Thompson, O'Scannlain

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.