Skip to main content
· 12/8/1989

United States v. a Single Story Double Wide Trailer

Citations

  • 727 F. Supp. 149
  • 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15242
  • 1989 WL 153360

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “[o]nly by filing a verified claim, in accordance with C(6), can a claimant demonstrate that he has a sufficient interest in the seized item to satisfy standing requirements”
  • “A failure to file a verified claim will only be excused if an action by the government caused the non-compliance.”
  • “[R]epeated efforts to find an attorney do not constitute excusable neglect where the claimant does not attempt to enter a pro se appearance or to explain the situation to the opposing party or the court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Latchum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.