United States v. $80,760.00 in U.S. Currency

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that such evidence is admissible if police can link the defendant to the narcotics through other, more direct methods
• questioning the probative value of a narcotics detection dog’s positive alert in the absence of any other credible evidence connecting the money to drugs
• questioning the probative value of a narcotics detection dog's positive alert in the absence of any other credible evidence connecting the money to drugs
• noting “a large.amount of money, found in combination with other persuasive circumstantial evidence, particularly the presence of drug paraphernalia, is frequently held sufficient to establish probable cause” (emphasis added)
• noting “a large amount of money, found in combination with other persuasive circumstantial evidence, particularly the presence of drug paraphernalia, is frequently held sufficient to establish probable cause” (emphasis added)
• “[T]he Court seriously questions the value of a dog’s alert without other persuasive evidence... ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).