Skip to main content
· 10/3/1986

Federal Case

Citations

  • 801 F.2d 738
  • 5 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 805
  • 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 32353

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • The government’s removal of forfeited property after the expiration of the ten day stay did not fall within the Rio Grande exception where the losing claimant failed to stay the district court’s judgment
  • The government's removal of forfeited property after the expiration of the ten day stay did not fall within the Rio Grande exception where the losing claimant failed to stay the district court's judgment
  • claimant failed to file for supersedeas or to appeal within the automatic 10-day stay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.