United States v. 789 Cases, More or Less

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[A] court should examine a wide range of evidence, including ... actual use of the product.”
• “[S]o long as the government has proved a single violation of the [C]GMP regulations, the seized articles are adulterated as a matter of law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).