United States v. 765.56 Acres of Land

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[a] party seeking a good cause extension bears a heavy burden of proof”
• noting that “this factor alone may be sufficient to justify extending the time for service”
• noting that “this factor alone may be sufficient to justify extending the time for service”
• noting that “the fact that the statute of limitations has run on a plaintiff’s claim” may be sufficient, standing alone, “to justify extending the time for service”
• rejecting the holding in Frasca due to the amendment of Rule 4
• “[C]ourts have consistently considered the fact that the statute of limitations has run on a plaintiff’s claim as a factor favoring the plaintiff in a Rule 4(m

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).