Skip to main content
· 1/6/1995

United States v. 6640 SW 48th St.

Citations

  • 41 F.3d 1448
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 192
  • 1995 WL 358

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that indictment for arson must allege value of property destroyed, because statute set punishment based on value
  • same in arson prosecution because, “[i]n addition to imprisonment in the penitentiary, the guilty person is liable to a fine not exceeding double the value of the property destroyed”
  • same in arson prosecution because, “[i]n addition to imprisonment in the peniten- tiary, the guilty person is liable to a fine not exceeding double the value of the property destroyed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clark, Hatchett, Kravitch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.