United States v. 64.88 Acres of Land

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the production of material, if applicable, shall be controlled by the confidentiality order in the case
• requiring the parties to share the costs of producing ESI that the court noted were “largely marginal documents”
• stating courts have held that Rule 26(c) permits cost shifting as part of enforcing proportionality limits
• recognizing courts may order cost-shifting to enforce proportionality limits
• revising ESI protocol from three iterations of search term process to a “reasonable number” and noting that the court “expects the parties to act in good faith and reasonably in implementing the ESI protocol”
• “While the Court in Zubulake was focusing upon the issue of cost shifting when dealing with inaccessible ESI, and other courts have required a showing of inaccessibility for cost shifting, other courts have held that Rule 26(c

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).