Skip to main content
· 4/14/1992

United States v. 5709 Hillingdon Road, Charlotte

Citations

  • 141 F.R.D. 429
  • 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5163
  • 1992 WL 78062

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to strike allegations that the defendants committed perjury and criminal misconduct because the allegations were related to the plaintiff's overall claim and the court could not say at that early stage that the allegations had no possible bearing
  • denying motion to strike and finding that while certain criminal allegations “may not pass Rule 11 scrutiny at a later stage in the litigation, we cannot say at this time that they have no possible bearing on the subject matter of plaintiff’s claim”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Potter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.