United States v. $493,850.00 in U.S. Currency

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000 did not alter the probable cause requirement
• holding that the Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000 did not alter the probable cause requirement
• concluding that CAFRA did not affect section 1615's requirement that the government to show probable cause when it files a forfeiture action
• holding that the passage of § 983(c) “did not abrogate 19 U.S.C. § 1615's requirement that the government show probable cause to institute a forfeiture action.”
• holding that CAFRA did not affect government's burden to plead prob- able cause
• noting that the plain language of a statute must be interpreted by examining “the provisions of the entire law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).