United States v. 4.85 Acres of Land

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• internal quotation marks 1 I concur with all aspects of the majority opinion except for the Rule 17 analysis. 20 JONES V. LVMPD and citation omitted
• not harmless error where district court improperly excluded post-taking sales in a condemnation action
• not harmless error where district court improperly excluded post-taking sales in a condemnation action
• district court’s error was not harmless because improper exclusion of evidence was prejudicial
• “To reverse a jury verdict for evidentiary error, we must find that the trial court abused its discretion in a manner that prejudiced the appealing party.”
• excluding other sales without determining comparability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).