Skip to main content
· 3/7/1956

United States v. 46 Gambling Devices

Citations

  • 138 F. Supp. 896
  • 1956 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3846

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that it is only during the second stage analysis that a court reviews “the disparate factual and employment settings of the individual plaintiffs”
  • applying notice standard even though “the parties have filed an impressive pile of declarations and deposition excerpts”
  • finding standard met based on affidavits from three 9 proposed lead plaintiffs
  • granting conditional certification of a nationwide 25 collective based on three declarations
  • noting that the two-step approach is preferred
  • finding standard met based on affidavits from three proposed lead plaintiffs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thomsen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.