· 3/7/1956
United States v. 46 Gambling Devices
Citations
- 138 F. Supp. 896
- 1956 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3846
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that it is only during the second stage analysis that a court reviews “the disparate factual and employment settings of the individual plaintiffs”
- applying notice standard even though “the parties have filed an impressive pile of declarations and deposition excerpts”
- finding standard met based on affidavits from three 9 proposed lead plaintiffs
- granting conditional certification of a nationwide 25 collective based on three declarations
- noting that the two-step approach is preferred
- finding standard met based on affidavits from three proposed lead plaintiffs
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thomsen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.