Skip to main content
· 4/26/2013

United States v. 4219 University Drive, Fairfax

Citations

  • 714 F.3d 782
  • 85 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 863
  • 2013 WL 1777511
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 8516

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding sufficient evidence to support conspiracy to commit health care fraud conviction where there was testimony regarding the several methods the defendant used to fraudulently bill health care benefit programs
  • “The statute of limitations is an affirmative defense that may be raised in a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim.”
  • “The statute of limitations is an affirmative defense that may be raised in a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim.”
  • “[I]f an evidentiary ruling is found to be erroneous, we review the error for harmlessness.”
  • “The statute of limitations is an affirmative defense that may be raised in a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilkinson, Keenan, Wynn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.