United States v. 37.15 Acres of Land

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “a growing number of courts have determined that the theory is not proper under Daubert and Rule 702, expressing the opinion that the any exposure theory is, at most, scientifically-grounded speculation: an untested and potentially untestable hypothesis”
• excluding expert testimony based on a “lack of information sufficient to show the level of exposure which does not create a risk of mesothelioma”
• excluding testimony despite plaintiffs citation to “numerous scholarly articles and scientific studies” because those materials were not specific to “the type of exposure Mr. Anderson had to Defendants’ products”
• excluding testimony despite plaintiffs citation to “numerous scholarly articles and scientific studies” because those materials were not specific to “the type of exposure Mr. Anderson had to Defendants’ products”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).