United States v. $359,500 in United States Currency, Benedetto Romano, Claimant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “‘contrasting language in similar statutes may show that the legislature intended different standards of compliance’” (quoting 2A Singer, Sutherland Statutory Construction, sec. 57.06, at 654 (Sands 4th ed. 1984))
• \'contrasting language in similar statutes may show that the legislature intended different standards of compliance'\ (quoting 2A Singer, Sutherland Statutory Construction, sec. 57.06, at 654 (Sands 4th ed. 1984))
• “‘contrasting language in similar statutes may show that the legislature intended different standards of compliance’” (quoting 2A Singer, Sutherland Statutory Construction, - 38 - sec. 57.06, at 654 (Sands 4th ed. 1984))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).