United States v. 353 Cases, More or Less

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[C]lassifying disclosure statements as opinion work product…encourages relators to include everything that might help the government in evaluating the case. . . .”
• “Work product 9 may include documents prepared by a party, as well as by the party’s attorney.”
• “Contrary to defendant’s assertion, the statutory requirement that relators disclose ‘substantially all material evidence and information’ does not mean that disclosure statements are ‘kitchen sink” documents that indiscriminately catalogue the universe of facts known to the relator. . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).