Skip to main content
· 11/8/1962

United States v. 32.99 Acres of Land in Coffey County

Citations

  • 211 F. Supp. 61
  • 1962 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3327

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “In order for a document produced during discovery to be protected, the producing party or third party need only stamp it ‘CONFIDENTIAL,’ or some other similar designation.”
  • “Express provisions of an order permitting non-parties to seek access to the protected materials will diminish the reasonableness of reliance a party claims to place on the order’s permanent secrecy.”
  • ‘Whether a protective order is entitled to MartindelV s strong presumption against modification is also dependent upon the circumstances surrounding its grant, i.e., how much consideration the court gave to the request for a protective order before granting it.”
  • “[T]here is no public right of access to discovery materials.”
  • noting more stringent standard employed in the Second Circuit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Templar

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.